James Kent Trotter vs Cing-Yang Meng Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs Meng analysis and find out who is favored!
James Kent Trotter vs Cing-Yang Meng Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 0 Meng
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 50.28% of points on their second serve, while Meng has won 57.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Meng has won 50.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 24.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 62.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Meng has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Meng winning 60.71% (W/L 17/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Meng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 39/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Meng has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trotter winning 1 times and Meng being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trotter winning 2 and Meng winning 0. The last match between Trotter and Meng was at the Taipei Challenger, 12-05-2024, Q1 round, Hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Meng have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and Meng 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 0, and Meng 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.1 while Meng has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Meng has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Meng has converted 34.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
371
Rank
371
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
844
High
25
Age
A
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (63-48)
Career Total W/L
50% (102-102)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | James Kent Trotter | Cing-Yang Meng |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | James Kent Trotter | Cing-Yang Meng |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 50% (3/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (29/26) | 46% (6/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (295/267) | 50% (67/67) |
Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.73 | 0.18 |
Aces Total | 200 | 12 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.21 |
DFs Total | 88 | 14 |
Avg Match Time | 1:35:49 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 281.81 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (990/1704) | 58% (142/246) |
1st Serve W% | 77% (763/990) | 70% (99/142) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (359/714) | 58% (60/104) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (51/123) | 41% (11/27) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1625) | 39% (103/264) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 54% (14/12) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 50% (3/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 25% (4/1) |
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trevor Svajda
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Moez Echargui
Player
James Kent Trotter
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Cing-Yang Meng Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nico Hornitschek
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aoran Wang
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
15
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cing-Yang Meng
Player
Shaoyun Liu
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Cing-Yang Meng
Player
Xin Hu
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(6) 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Leonardo Borrelli
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
5-7 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
29
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
57 of
73)
69%
(
31 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
32 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(10) 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H |
view more