search

James Kent Trotter vs Cing-Yang Meng Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs Meng analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

James Kent Trotter vs Cing-Yang Meng Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 0 Meng

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 50.28% of points on their second serve, while Meng has won 57.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Meng has won 50.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 24.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 62.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Meng has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Meng winning 60.71% (W/L 17/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Meng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 39/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Meng has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trotter winning 1 times and Meng being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trotter winning 2 and Meng winning 0. The last match between Trotter and Meng was at the Taipei Challenger, 12-05-2024, Q1 round, Hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Meng have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and Meng 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 0, and Meng 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.1 while Meng has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Meng has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Meng has converted 34.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
James Kent Trotter

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

371

Rank

371

High

24

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

891

Rank

844

High

25

Age

A

Plays

Cing-Yang Meng

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L L W L W L W W

Form

L W W L L W W W L L

57% (63-48)

Career Total W/L

50% (102-102)

54% (14-12)

YTD W/L

50% (3-3)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Trotter VS Meng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats James Kent Trotter Cing-Yang Meng
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 3
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Trotter VS Meng H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-1

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats James Kent Trotter Cing-Yang Meng
YTD W/L 54% (14/12) 50% (3/3)
Sets Win/Loss 53% (29/26) 46% (6/7)
Games Win/Loss 52% (295/267) 50% (67/67)
Hard Win/Loss 54% (7/6) 0% (0/1)
Clay Win/Loss 25% (1/3) 60% (3/2)
Indoor Hard W/L 67% (6/3) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.73 0.18
Aces Total 200 12
DFs per game 0.32 0.21
DFs Total 88 14
Avg Match Time 1:35:49 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 281.81 0
1st Serve % 58% (990/1704) 58% (142/246)
1st Serve W% 77% (763/990) 70% (99/142)
2nd Serve W% 50% (359/714) 58% (60/104)
BPs Won% Total 41% (51/123) 41% (11/27)
Return Pts W% 35% (575/1625) 39% (103/264)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 54% (14/12) 0% (0/1)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 60% (3/2)
Best of 3 Sets W% 52% (13/25) 50% (3/6)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (5/10) 33% (1/3)
Deciding Set W% 50% (2/4) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, W 92% (13/12) 100% (2/2)
1st set W, L 8% (13/1) 0% (2/0)
1st set L, W 15% (13/2) 25% (4/1)

James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trevor Svajda
59% ( 39 of 66)
1st Serve %
52% ( 42 of 81)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82% ( 32 of 39)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 28 of 42)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 17 of 39)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
32% ( 21 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 36 of 81)
81
Total Points Won
66
W
6-4 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72% ( 63 of 87)
1st Serve %
53% ( 49 of 92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67% ( 42 of 63)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 38 of 49)
63% ( 15 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 14 of 43)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 30 of 87)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 40 of 92)
97
Total Points Won
82
L
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61% ( 46 of 75)
1st Serve %
54% ( 45 of 83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 29 of 45)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 17 of 38)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
33% ( 25 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 37 of 83)
87
Total Points Won
71
W
4-6 6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57% ( 52 of 91)
1st Serve %
49% ( 51 of 105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62% ( 32 of 52)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 38 of 51)
64% ( 25 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 29 of 54)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
37% ( 34 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 38 of 105)
95
Total Points Won
101
L
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62% ( 32 of 52)
1st Serve %
51% ( 23 of 45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72% ( 23 of 32)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
60
Total Points Won
37
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Moez Echargui
Player
James Kent Trotter
55% ( 40 of 73)
1st Serve %
54% ( 42 of 78)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
1
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 30 of 42)
61% ( 20 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 15 of 36)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
36% ( 26 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 33 of 78)
80
Total Points Won
71
L
7-6(2) 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54% ( 38 of 71)
1st Serve %
53% ( 34 of 64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68% ( 26 of 38)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 24 of 34)
58% ( 19 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
37% ( 26 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 64)
72
Total Points Won
63
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56% ( 34 of 61)
1st Serve %
62% ( 53 of 85)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
91% ( 31 of 34)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 33 of 53)
44% ( 12 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 14 of 32)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 18 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 38 of 85)
81
Total Points Won
65
W
7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53% ( 36 of 68)
1st Serve %
62% ( 38 of 61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89% ( 32 of 36)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
41% ( 13 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 23 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 24 of 61)
69
Total Points Won
60
W
6-4 7-5 H2H

Cing-Yang Meng Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Nico Hornitschek
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
67% ( 38 of 57)
1st Serve %
60% ( 48 of 80)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 28 of 48)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 14 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 33 of 80)
76
Total Points Won
61
L
7-6(3) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Aoran Wang
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
56% ( 46 of 82)
1st Serve %
54% ( 36 of 67)
15
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
85% ( 39 of 46)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 28 of 36)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
30% ( 25 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 23 of 67)
80
Total Points Won
69
L
7-6(3) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Cing-Yang Meng
Player
Shaoyun Liu
52% ( 36 of 69)
1st Serve %
49% ( 34 of 70)
6
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 24 of 34)
61% ( 20 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 15 of 36)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
36% ( 25 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 70)
75
Total Points Won
64
W
7-5 6-4 H2H
Q2
cross
Cing-Yang Meng
Player
Xin Hu
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86% ( 19 of 22)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 17 of 36)
63% ( 5 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 5 of 19)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 6 of 30)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 33 of 55)
57
Total Points Won
28
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
W
4-6 7-6(6) 10-7 H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Leonardo Borrelli
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
67% ( 56 of 84)
1st Serve %
73% ( 57 of 78)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
71% ( 40 of 56)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 38 of 57)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
37% ( 31 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 31 of 78)
84
Total Points Won
78
L
5-7 6-3 11-9 H2H
Q2
W
7-5 7-5 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 4-6 11-9 H2H
R1
cross
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cing-Yang Meng
55% ( 56 of 101)
1st Serve %
66% ( 73 of 110)
29
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
86% ( 48 of 56)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 57 of 73)
69% ( 31 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
22% ( 22 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 32 of 110)
111
Total Points Won
100
L
6-7(10) 7-6(1) 6-2 H2H

Trotter Vs Meng Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For James Kent Trotter

Tyler Challenger

Kuzuhara vs Trotter H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Bouzige vs Trotter H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Shelbayh vs Trotter H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Trotter vs Hsu H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Trotter vs Langmo H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions